- Windows 7 beta shows off task bar, UI goodies
- How the yellow first-down line actually works
- Outlook '09
- Microsoft research projects to improve our lives
- Ballmer sets loose Windows 7 public beta
Senior Editor Tim Greene clarifies issues surrounding the evolving NAC security architecture.
Microsoft comes out on top of the NAC heap in an evaluation of 10 vendors that was published recently by Forrester Research. (Compare NAC products)
The result is interesting because it’s not based on how many units were sold or performance tests but rather on evaluation of how well the products would meet the challenges of a set of real-world deployment situations.
These included controlling access based on role and identity of the user, how well the products handled guest access, how well they worked in wireless and virtual-desktop environments, how well they support and make use of existing infrastructure, and how well they restrict application access, among others.
Another large chunk of ratings went to the vendors’ strategies for long-term development of their products. So Microsoft benefited from its support of other Microsoft products such as Active Directory and System Center Configuration Manager. It also benefited from its large body of partners whose NAC gear interoperates with Microsoft’s network access protection (NAP) the name for its flavor of NAC.
Cisco and Juniper round out the top three scorers in the Forrester study, but a much smaller vendor, Bradford Networks, ranked in the same overall category - leaders. Forrester credits ease of deployment, support for multiple enforcement options and the ability to scale in large deployments for the high ranking.
The study says that other vendors use a similar architecture to that used by Bradford, but “Bradford has the best all-round support for third-party infrastructure,” meaning it interoperates better with more products by other vendors. Forrester also liked the company’s roadmap.
For more about the report entitled “Forrester Wave: Network Access Control: Q3 2008” click here.
Tim Greene is senior editor at Network World.
Comments (5)
Microsoft NAP will win the battle for the endpointBy toddhooper on September 30, 2008, 5:15 pmI think Forrester got it right - as they said, Microsoft is 'near-ubiquitous' in the large enterprise which this report covers. When one of the enterprise NAC...
Reply | Read entire comment
Read the report!By Anonymous on September 17, 2008, 11:33 amFolks this article is just highlighting the Forrester report. Read the Forrester report for the details!
Reply | Read entire comment
Report is misleadingBy Anonymous on September 16, 2008, 11:37 pmAre people using NAC and NAP components or has Cisco and Microsoft counted the number of capable devices shipped? I thought I heard that Bradford really only works...
Reply | Read entire comment
Misleading articleBy Anonymous on September 16, 2008, 11:49 amAfter reading through the report, your article and title is very misleading. In terms of current offering, Juniper seems to have the edge. In terms of strategy,...
Reply | Read entire comment
NAC comparisonBy Anonymous on September 16, 2008, 11:29 amYour title mentions Microsoft's NAC product as being the best yet your NAC comparison page doesn't even list them. What's going on?
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments