- Windows 7 beta shows off task bar, UI goodies
- How the yellow first-down line actually works
- Outlook '09
- Microsoft research projects to improve our lives
- Ballmer sets loose Windows 7 public beta
Shortcomings of an MPLS service led printing firm Wise Business Forms to dump the network service in favor of an Internet-based VPN that delivers better speed at less cost and will pay for itself in 16 months.
The firm's 250 users had recurring troubles with reliability of the four AT&T T-1s feeding MPLS to its Alpharetta, Ga., headquarters, says Marc Picardo, director of IT for Wise, but the determining factor was cost not performance.
When the private company installed a new digital printing application that would boost the bandwidth requirements among its eight locations spread out in six states east of the Mississippi, Picardo started looking for less-expensive options than the $1,400 to $1,800 per month per site that doubling up the 1.5M bps MPLS T-1s would cost. The monthly cost per site of the VPN connections, which double the bandwidth of the T-1s, is about $250, he says -- less than he was paying for the MPLS service.
Wise's system integrators, Perket Technologies, recommended using the Internet as the WAN and connecting to it via lower-cost DSL and cable connections. Having a DSL link to an ISP and a cable link to another ISP at each site, they would have redundant services to maintain reliability, Picardo says.
Perket, which had initially assisted Wise in converting from frame relay to MPLS two years ago, recommended dual Stonesoft StoneGate firewall/VPN appliances at each site to link them to the Internet. Picardo says the firewalls can use both Internet connections simultaneously to load balance traffic at each site, and if one link goes down the devices failover to the other line.
One of the more time-consuming jobs of the transition was lining up the DSL and cable services. Because of the wide dispersion of the sites and the mix of access technologies, Picardo had to contract for WAN services with nine separate providers.
Now that all the lines are in, that number of providers doesn't create extra work. If a line fails, he makes a call to the provider of that line; he'd have to make such a call even if there were just one provider. So far, the only outages the VPN has experienced were due to problems inside the providers' networks, not on the last-mile access lines to Wise sites, he says.
Bandwidth the cable and DSL links provide is ample, and when one line has failed, the StoneGate appliances have diverted all traffic to the second connection.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (15)
Take it one step further with WAN Optimization!By Anonymous on January 7, 2009, 5:14 pmTake a close look at Ipanema Technologies carrier class WAN Optimization offering, specifically SmartPath features to utilize both links and DYNAMICALLY protect...
Reply | Read entire comment
Multi-Link TechnologyBy Anonymous on December 29, 2008, 9:13 pmHere is the point of the story...using Stonegate's patent Multi-Link Technology, you have 99.999% or higher uptime using 2 different providers. The vehicle could...
Reply | Read entire comment
No actually it works wellBy Anonymous on December 16, 2008, 3:34 pmWe have a huge ATT MPLS and it works very well. Its likely a problem with end user equipement or WAN configs. Internet VPN is actually less reliable.
Reply | Read entire comment
How can MPLS be the ONLY option?By Anon on December 9, 2008, 10:18 pmWe did something similar to this several years ago and it ended up saving us a great deal of money. We operate 24x7 so I don't see how anyone can say MPLS is the...
Reply | Read entire comment
Only for a printing company would this be acceptableBy Anonymous on December 8, 2008, 10:10 amSerious firms need an SLA, someone (preferably in the US) to call when things are down. Think a DSL provider is going to respond quickly to a downed line? think...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments